(716) 759-4529 Tap to Call, Free Consultation

Extreme Risk Protection Orders in New York: How a Family Member Files

Reviewed for legal accuracy by Pieter G. Weinrieb, Esq. · Admitted NY 2005

New York’s red flag law lets a family or household member ask a court to take firearms away from a relative who has become a danger. Most people never learn the option exists.

What Is an Extreme Risk Protection Order?

Were you served with a temporary ERPO?

Weinrieb Law handles the petitioner side of extreme risk protection orders. We help a family or household member bring an application. We do not represent respondents in ERPO proceedings. If you have been served with a temporary extreme risk protection order, speak with a criminal defense attorney experienced in firearms matters, and do it now: the hearing is set 3 to 10 days after the application is filed. The Bar Association of Erie County runs a Lawyer Referral and Information Service.

An extreme risk protection order, or ERPO, is a civil court order that stops a person from having or buying a firearm, rifle or shotgun and requires them to give up the ones they already have. It is New York’s red flag law, and it lives in Article 63-A of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.

An ERPO is a firearms order. It is not a stay-away order. This is the single most common misunderstanding about the law, and it matters, because people who need both sometimes ask for only one. An ERPO does not direct anyone to keep away from you, leave your home, or stop contacting you. It addresses guns and nothing else. If you also need distance, that is a family offense order of protection, and it is a separate case in a separate court.

The law took effect on August 24, 2019, 180 days after it was signed as chapter 19 of the Laws of 2019. It is used far more than most people realize. The Erie County District Attorney maintains a dedicated ERPO unit, and the Bar Association of Erie County has run continuing legal education on how to bring these applications.

Who Can File for an ERPO in New York?

Under CPLR 6340, five categories of people may petition for an extreme risk protection order:

  • A family or household member of the person at risk, using the definition in Social Services Law 459-a(2).
  • A police officer, or a law enforcement agency with jurisdiction where the respondent lives.
  • A district attorney with jurisdiction in the county or city where the respondent lives.
  • A school administrator, or school personnel the administrator designates.
  • A treating licensed health care practitioner from an enumerated list that includes a licensed physician, psychiatrist or psychologist, a registered nurse, a licensed clinical social worker, a certified clinical nurse specialist or nurse practitioner, a licensed marriage and family therapist, a licensed master social worker, and a licensed mental health counselor, who examined or treated the person within the previous six months.

The first category is the one this page is about, and it is the one that tends to get lost. New York State’s own public-facing explanation of the red flag law lists teachers, school administrators, mental health professionals, police and district attorneys. It does not mention family or household members at all. The statute does. If you are a spouse, a former spouse, a parent, an adult child, a sibling, someone who shares a home with the person, or someone who has a child in common with them, you may be able to bring this application yourself.

Law enforcement does not get a choice in every case. CPLR 6341 provides that a law enforcement agency, police officer or district attorney shall file an application on receiving credible information indicating that a person is likely to engage in conduct resulting in serious harm, unless the officer determines there is no probable cause. So reporting your concern to police is a real alternative to filing yourself, and often the faster one.

Where You File, and Why a Family Lawyer Handles It

An ERPO application is filed in the Supreme Court of the county where the respondent lives. That surprises people who expect Family Court. For Erie County, that is Supreme Court at 25 Delaware Avenue in Buffalo, not Family Court at 1 Niagara Plaza.

The reason a family law firm handles these anyway is that the facts almost always come out of a family matter. The person worried enough to file is usually a spouse in the middle of a separation, a parent of an adult child in crisis, or someone who has just petitioned for an order of protection and realized the respondent owns firearms. The evidence is the same evidence. The timeline runs alongside the Family Court case. Splitting the two across two firms rarely serves anyone.

The court’s own form, the Application for a Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order (UCS-6341), is available as a fillable PDF from the New York courts. You are allowed to file without a lawyer. Whether you should is a different question, and it usually turns on how much evidence you have and whether the respondent is likely to contest the final order.

How Long an ERPO Takes

The timeline is short by design, because the statute exists for situations that will not wait.

  1. You file the application. The judge decides the request for a temporary order the same day it is filed.
  2. The hearing on a final order is set for 3 to 10 days after filing. That is the whole window, whether or not a temporary order was granted.
  3. A final ERPO runs up to one year and states its own expiration date on its face.
  4. Renewal. Within the 60 days before the order expires, the petitioner may file an application for renewal, and the judge may renew it for up to one more year.

If the order is granted, police remove any firearms, rifles and shotguns the respondent has. The order also bars buying one, or attempting to.

What the Court Has to Find

There are two different standards at two different stages, and confusing them is the most common error in writing about this law.

For a temporary order, CPLR 6342(1) allows the court to act “ex parte or otherwise” on a finding of “probable cause to believe the respondent is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to himself, herself or others.” Probable cause is a comparatively low threshold, which is why a same-day decision is possible.

For a final order, CPLR 6343(2) raises the bar considerably. The petitioner carries the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm, as defined in Mental Hygiene Law 9.39(a).

That cross-reference is not decoration. “Likelihood to result in serious harm” takes its meaning from the Mental Hygiene Law, and in most cases the relevant branch is 9.39(a)(2): a substantial risk of physical harm to other persons as manifested by homicidal or other violent behavior by which others are placed in reasonable fear of serious physical harm.

The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is the appellate court for Erie and Niagara Counties, addressed exactly this in 2026. In Matter of New York State Police v Galliher, the lower court found that the respondent had participated with others in an act of violence, but then decided he was not “likely” to cause serious harm by consulting the Merriam-Webster definition of the word instead of the statutory one. The Fourth Department’s response was direct: “That was error.” The court reversed and granted the final ERPO, holding that the petitioner had met the clear and convincing standard by establishing that the respondent actively participated in the assault of a restrained incarcerated individual.

Galliher is worth knowing for two practical reasons. Proven past violence can carry the burden on its own; the statute does not require an expert to predict the future. And the standard is the statutory one, not a judge’s ordinary-language sense of what is likely.

The Eight Factors a New York Court Must Consider

CPLR 6342(2) directs the court to consider “any relevant factors including, but not limited to, the following acts of the respondent”:

  1. A threat or act of violence or use of physical force directed toward self, the petitioner, or another person.
  2. A violation or alleged violation of an order of protection.
  3. Any pending charge or conviction for an offense involving the use of a weapon.
  4. The reckless use, display or brandishing of a firearm, rifle or shotgun.
  5. Any history of a violation of an extreme risk protection order.
  6. Evidence of recent or ongoing abuse of controlled substances or alcohol.
  7. Evidence of recent acquisition of a firearm, rifle, shotgun or other deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, or any ammunition therefor.
  8. Evidence of recent acts of aggravated cruelty to animals, as defined in section 353-a of the Agriculture and Markets Law.

Two statutory riders travel with that list. The court must weigh how much time has passed since the conduct and how old the respondent was when it happened. And for the factors framed in terms of recency, “recent” means within the six months before the petition was filed.

Note the second factor in particular. An alleged violation of an order of protection counts, even if it has never been adjudicated. So does a pending weapons charge, without a conviction. The statute is built around risk rather than proven guilt.

One point of precision that is often gotten wrong: this eight-factor list appears in the section governing temporary orders. It applies at the final hearing too, because CPLR 6343(2) directs the court to consider the CPLR 6342(2) factors there as well, and Galliher confirms it.

ERPO Compared With an Order of Protection

These two orders get confused constantly. They come from different statutes, go to different courts, and do different work.

Extreme risk protection order compared with a Family Court order of protection in New York
  Extreme risk protection order Family Court order of protection
Governing lawCPLR article 63-AFamily Court Act article 8
CourtSupreme Court in the respondent’s countyFamily Court; also Criminal Court or Supreme Court in a pending divorce
Who may fileFamily or household member, police, district attorney, school administrator, or a treating health care practitionerA person in one of the relationships article 8 covers
What it restrainsHaving, buying or attempting to buy a firearm, rifle or shotgun. Nothing else.Contact and conduct: stay away, refrain from, exclusion from a residence, and related terms
StandardProbable cause for a temporary order; clear and convincing evidence for a final orderPreponderance of the evidence on a family offense
DurationUp to one year, renewable for up to one moreCommonly up to 2 years, up to 5 with aggravating circumstances
FirearmsSurrender is the entire purpose of the orderPossible, but only on the findings Family Court Act 842-a requires
Effect on custodyNo direct effect on custody or parenting timeFrequently significant; see domestic violence and custody

Using Both Together

For most of the families we see, the realistic answer is both, running in parallel.

The family offense petition goes to Erie County Family Court at 1 Niagara Plaza and does the work of distance: stay away from the home, the workplace, the children’s school, no contact by phone or text or through third parties. The ERPO goes to Supreme Court at 25 Delaware Avenue and does the work of disarming.

They are not redundant. A Family Court order of protection can reach firearms, but only if the judge makes one of the findings Family Court Act 842-a requires, and the relief tracks the order of protection rather than standing on its own. An ERPO is aimed at firearms from the start and can be brought against someone who is not a party to any Family Court case. It is also available where no family offense has been committed at all, which matters when the danger is a relative in a mental health crisis rather than an abuser.

Running two cases at once takes coordination. The evidence overlaps, the hearing dates will not, and testimony given in one proceeding can be used in the other. That is a reason to have one lawyer holding both files.

How Weinrieb Law Handles ERPO Matters

We represent petitioners. If you are a family or household member and you are frightened about a relative’s access to firearms, we can evaluate whether the facts support an application, prepare and file it, and represent you at the hearing, alongside any family offense or custody matter already underway.

We do not represent respondents in ERPO proceedings. If you have been served with a temporary extreme risk protection order, you need a criminal defense attorney experienced in firearms matters, and you need one quickly, because your hearing is 3 to 10 days out from the filing. The Bar Association of Erie County operates a Lawyer Referral and Information Service that can point you to counsel.

Founding attorney Pieter G. Weinrieb has practiced divorce and family law in Western New York for more than 20 years and serves on the Attorney for the Child panels in Erie and Niagara Counties. Katrina Loss brings focused experience in family offense and domestic violence proceedings from her clinical training in the Family Violence and Women’s Rights Clinic. Contact us to talk through your situation.

This page is general information about New York law, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. If someone is in immediate danger, call 911.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a family member file a red flag order in New York?

Yes. CPLR 6340 expressly lists a family or household member, as defined in Social Services Law 459-a(2), among the people who may petition for an extreme risk protection order. New York State's own public explanation of the red flag law omits this category, which is one reason many families never learn the option exists. Police officers, district attorneys, school administrators and certain treating health care practitioners may also file.

Does an ERPO keep someone away from me?

No. An extreme risk protection order is a firearms order. It stops the respondent from having, buying or attempting to buy a firearm, rifle or shotgun, and requires surrender of any they already have. It does not order anyone to stay away from you, leave a shared home, or stop contacting you. If you need distance as well, that is a separate family offense order of protection in Family Court.

How long does an extreme risk protection order last in New York?

A final ERPO can last up to one year and states its expiration date on its face. Within the 60 days before it expires, the petitioner may file an application for renewal, and the judge may renew it for up to one more year. A temporary order issued at filing lasts until the hearing, which is set 3 to 10 days after the application is filed.

What court handles ERPOs in Erie County?

Supreme Court, not Family Court. An ERPO application is filed in the Supreme Court of the county where the respondent lives, which for Erie County means 25 Delaware Avenue in Buffalo. A family offense order of protection, by contrast, is filed in Erie County Family Court at 1 Niagara Plaza. Someone pursuing both will have two cases in two courthouses.

What does the court have to find before issuing a final ERPO?

At the final hearing the petitioner must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the respondent is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm as defined in Mental Hygiene Law 9.39(a). In Matter of New York State Police v Galliher, decided in 2026, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department held it was error for a court to measure likelihood against a dictionary definition instead of the statutory one, and that proven participation in a violent act satisfied the standard.

What happens to the guns?

If the order is issued, police remove any firearms, rifles and shotguns the respondent has, and the respondent is barred from buying one or attempting to buy one while the order is in effect. The court must also direct a law enforcement background investigation covering the respondent's criminal history, pending charges, parole or probation status, registered firearms, and order of protection history.

About the author

Pieter G. Weinrieb, Esq. has practiced divorce and family law in Western New York for more than 20 years. Admitted to the New York State Bar in 2005, he holds a J.D. from Pace Law School and an M.A. in Humanities from SUNY Buffalo, is a 42-hour certified family and divorce mediator, and serves on the Attorney for the Child panels in Erie and Niagara Counties. He founded Weinrieb Law in Williamsville in 2011. Read his full bio.

Get a Consultation

Tell us about your situation. We respond within one business day: confidential and no obligation.

🔒 Confidential • Attorney-client privilege applies • Privacy Policy Site Map

✓  Message received. We'll respond within one business day.
For urgent matters, call (716) 759-4529.

Worried About a Relative and a Gun?

Talk it through with us in a confidential consultation. If someone is in immediate danger, call 911.

Schedule a Meeting   (716) 759-4529